Appeals Court Decisions
- In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation, 242 F.3d 497, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3551, 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2105 (3d Cir. 2001)
- In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation, 58 F.3d 896, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15919, 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1545 (3d Cir. 2001)
- In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation, 57 F.3d 1255, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15921, 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1556 (3d Cir. 1995)
- In re Lucent Death Benefits ERISA Litig., 541 F.3d 250, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18514, 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2185 (3d Cir. 2008)
- Harley v. Minnesota Min. and Mfg. Co., 284 F.3d 901, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4846, 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2089 (8th Cir. 2002)
- Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp., 213 F.3d 124, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11416, 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2243 (3d Cir. 2000)
- Flanigan v. General Elec. Co., 242 F. 3d 78, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3244, 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2237 (2d Cir. 2001)
- In re Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan and IRAP Litigation, 957 F.2d 1020, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2930, 14 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2569 (2d Cir. 1992)
- District Court Decisions
- Fulghum v. Embarq Corp., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104229, 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 390 (D. Kans. 2008)
- Raetsch v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46148, 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1019 (D.N.J. 2008)
- Raetsch v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78422, 39 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1531 (D.N.J. 2006)
- Mehling v. New York Life Ins. Co., 248 F.R.D. 455, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16968, 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1791 (E.D.Pa. 2008)
- Adair v. Unisys Corp. (In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits ERISA Litig.), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51906, 41 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2609 (E.D. Pa. 2007)
- Adair v. Unisys Corp. (In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits ERISA Litig.), 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72026, 39 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1435 (E.D.Pa. 2006)
- Harley v. Minnesota Min. and Mfg. Co., 42 F. Supp. 2d 898, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4184 (D.Minn. 1999)
- Stagi v. AMTRAK, 407 F. Supp. 2d 671, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37835 (E.D.Pa. 2005)
- Godshall v. Franklin Mint Co., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23976, 34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2357 (E.D.Pa. 2004)
- Saxton v. Central Pa. Teamsters Pension Fund, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23983, 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1126 (E.D.Pa. 2003)
- Bell v. Executive Committee of United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Plan for Employees, 191 F.Supp.2d 10, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1797, 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2015 (D.D.C. 2002)
- Mehling v. New York Life Ins. Co., 163 F. Supp.2d 502, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6340 (E.D.Pa. 2001)
- Cullen v. Whitman Med. Corp., 197 F.R.D. 136, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14434 (E.D.Pa. 2000)
- McHenry v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13947; 23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1977, and 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7182 (E.D.Pa. 1999)
- McHenry v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12733, 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1849 (E.D.Pa. 1998)
- Local 56, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Campbell Soup Co. (In re Campbell Soup Company Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation), 954 F.Supp. 1000, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2134 (D.N.J. 1997)
- Fuller v. Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 168 F.R.D. 588, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14097 (E.D. Mich. 1996)
- Local 56, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Campbell Soup Co. (In re Campbell Soup Company Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation), 898 F. Supp 1118, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13047, 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1905 (D.N.J. 1995)
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Use of this website does not create any attorney-client relationship.
Copyright © 2010 by Sandals & Associates, P.C. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.