Sandals & Associates, P.C.

  • Phone:215-825-4000
    Toll Free: 866-319-5730
  • Fax:215-825-4001
  • Email Us
One South Broad Street, Suite 1850
Philadelphia, PA 19107-3418 U.S.A. View Map

Attorneys

Alan M. Sandals

ISLN: 904060698
Member
Email: click here to contact

Practice Areas

ERISA; Pension Plans; Employee Benefits Plans; Retirement Benefit Plans; Fair Labor Standards; Consumer Protection; Complex and Multi-district Litigation; Class Actions; Antitrust

Admitted: 1980, District of Columbia; 1982, Pennsylvania
Law School: University of Pennsylvania, J.D.
Member: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and American Bar Associations.
Biography: Pennsylvania Super Lawyer 2005-2011; Panelist and Lecturer: ERISA Litigation, Federal Judicial Center, 1998 and 2002; American Bar Association, 1999-2002; Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 1999, 2002-2003; LEXIS/NEXIS, 2002-2003.
Born: Manchester, Connecticut, 1954
Cases: In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation, 579 F.3d 220 (3d Cir. 2010), 242 F.3d 497 (3d Cir. 2001), and 57 F.3d 1255 and 58 F.3d 896 (3d Cir. 1995); Stagi v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 391 Fed. Appx. 133, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17261 (3d Cir. 2010); Harley v. Minnesota Min. and Mfg. Co., 284 F.3d 901 (8th Cir. 2002), and 42 F.Supp.2d 898 (D. Minn. 1999); Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp., 213 F.3d 124 (3d Cir. 2000); In re Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan Litigation, 957 F.2d 1020 (2d Cir. 1992); Zebrowski v. Evonik Degussa Corp. Admin Committee, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18596 (E.D. Pa. 2011); Fulghum v. Embarq Corp., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1120 (D. Kan. 2011), and 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80930 (D. Kan. 2009); Raetsch v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46148 (D.N.J. 2008); Adair v. Unisys Corp. (In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits ERISA Litig.), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51906 (E.D. Pa. 2007), and 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72026 (E.D. Pa. 2006); Saxton v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23983 (E.D. Pa. 2003); Godshall v. The Franklin Mint Company, 285 F.Supp.2d 628 (E.D. Pa. 2003); Bell v. Executive Committee of United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Plan for Employees, 191 F.Supp.2d 10 (D.D.C. 2002); McHenry v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7182 (E.D. Pa. 1999), and 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12733 (E.D. Pa. 1998); Local 56, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Campell Soup Co., (In re Campbell Soup Company Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation), 954 F.Supp. 1000 (D.N.J. 1997), and 898 F.Supp. 1118 (D.N.J. 1995).


Super Lawyers Logo                                   AV Rated - Martindale-Hubbell LexisNexis

Areas of Practice

  • Employee and Retiree Benefits and Pensions - ERISA
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Fair Labor Standards Act
  • Antitrust & Consumer Protection
  • National Class Actions & Complex Litigation
More

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Sandals & Associates, P.C. website is powered by LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell®. || Sitemap